What The Dinky Can Learn From James Bond’s Aquatic Car

James Bond's aquatic Lotus Esprit from

James Bond’s aquatic Lotus Esprit (left) from ‘The Spy Who Loved Me’ may be a model for future transit opportunities along Princeton’s Dinky (right) rail right-of-way. (click to expand)

(Mild spoiler alert-contains scene reveals that will absolutely not ruin the enjoyment of the movies discussed.) Back in the days before Michael J Fox jump-started a heavily modified DeLorean using a 1.21 Gigawatts lightning bolt, the coolest car in the world was James Bond’s white Lotus Esprit from the 1977 movie, ‘The Spy Who Loved Me‘. In addition to a legendary power ballad theme song sung by Carly Simon, the movie features an amazing sequence where Bond (played by über-1970s man, Roger Moore) is chased in his car by a particularly terrifying adversary. Running towards a cliff at high speed, Bond appears done for, but he survives driving into the sea when his car becomes a submarine.

Things look bad for Bond...(click to expand)

Things look bad for Bond…(click to expand)

The ability to adapt to two different transportation environments is the defining feature of a ‘dual-mode vehicle‘. Bond’s submarine Lotus Esprit is a special example, as it can operate on roads and underwater, but other examples exist. For example, a hovercraft has advantages for amphibious landing based on its ability to transition seamlessly from sea to land.

Haha! The baddies were not expecting this! (click to expand)

Haha! The baddies were not expecting this! (click to expand)

At the present time, Princeton’s historic Dinky line faces an uncertain future. Its railroad right-of-way has been cut back by Princeton University, who placed a higher premium on expanding their facilities over maintaining the existing transit station. But Princeton needs more transit, to facilitate car-free and car-lite living. Moving the train further away from the town is a burden on local residents, the majority of whom live north of Nassau Street, far away from the proposed new Dinky Station. The risk is that fewer people will ride the train because of its distance from the town, leading to increased traffic, and potentially endangering the long-term sustainability of the line.

Things are looking up for Bond thanks to his dual-mode vehicle. (click to expand)

Things are looking up for Bond thanks to his dual-mode vehicle. (click to expand)

Extending a heavy rail train line to Nassau Street was recently ruled out by a committee established to examine transit alternatives along Alexander Street. It seems that the Dinky in its current form will never be able to get up to the town. But residents are very skeptical about replacing the train with a bus. One potential solution is for the Dinky to become a ‘dual-mode vehicle’, capable of using rails along its existing right-of-way, and then converting to road tires so that it could travel further north into downtown Princeton. It would require a different train/vehicle, but the present Dinky Arrow I train only dates from the 1970s. Several kinds of locomotives have historically ran along the Dinky tracks (for example, here is a picture of PRR MP54 rolling stock used in 1977 – can you spot the difference from the current Dinky train?)

Such vehicles in fact already exist. Toyota has invested heavily in building a train-bus hybrid, that can switch from regular rubber tires to rails in a matter of seconds. Could this be an answer for the Dinky? Hard to say, the video below makes the technology look a bit clunky, but it’s definitely an option worth keeping in mind. As coolness goes, it’s not exactly James Bond, but we live in the real world and have to look for the technology that offers the greatest benefit to potential local transit users!

What do you think is the best solution for future transit along Alexander Street? Leave your comment using the box below.

This entry was posted in Alternative Transportation, Transit and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to What The Dinky Can Learn From James Bond’s Aquatic Car

  1. Wow says:

    For me the idea of maintaining the Dinky right of way is key. If it was replaced with a bus that used the regular roads to get over to Princeton Junction then there is little advantage to taking it – whether I drive or take the bus I get to sit in traffic, and if I drive I can go direct from my house. However if the dinky right-of-way is maintained then there is an advantage: skipping the traffic backlog! Its neither here-nor-there to me if the dinky runs on tracks or if they rip out the tracks and replace with a bus as long as it retains its traffic-free route. And if using a ‘guided bus’ meant that the Dinky could make it into town, and hence more convenient, then I’d give it the thumbs up (of course having to mix with traffic for the dinky station-to-nassau portion of the journey would be a pain).

  2. Pingback: Princeton Transit Task Force To Host Public Consultation This Saturday | walkableprinceton

  3. I research dual wheel vehicle in grad school and they are prone to problems. I just say run a conventional and cheap bus on a closed to traffic Dinky ROW and be done with it. You could then pick me up in Palmer Square, thanks!

  4. It’s late! “I researchED”, “vehicleS”!

  5. Pingback: Princeton Transit Study Suggests Streetcar Will Be Best Option For Dinky Upgrade | walkableprinceton

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s